Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28930830›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2017

Effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in patients undergoing open gastrectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Hengfei Luan, Pin Zhu, Xiaobao Zhang, Liang Tian, Jiying Feng, Yong Wu, Yongxin Yan, Zhibin Zhao, Xiaoping Gu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hengfei LuanDepartment of Anesthesiology Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang City, Lianyungang Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Pin Zhu
Xiaobao Zhang
Liang Tian
Jiying Feng
Yong Wu
Yongxin Yan
Zhibin Zhao
Xiaoping Gu
The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe primary objective of this study was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine could potentiate the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, when added to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.

methodsFifty patients scheduled for open gastrectomy were divided into 2 equal groups that were received wound infiltration using 20 mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2 mL normal saline (group R) or 20 mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2 mL 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group DR). Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump press number, sufentanil consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and wound healing score were recorded.

resultsThe VAS pain score were comparable between the 2 groups at the observation time points (P > .05), PCA pump press number and sufentanil consumption were higher in group R than that in group DR at 0 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 6 time intervals (P < .05) except for 6 to 8, 8 to 10, 10 to 12 time intervals (P > .05), meanwhile, the 24 hours total sufentanil consumption was also higher in group R than that in group DR (90.4 ± 20.5 vs 79.2 ± 9.4) (P < .05), there were no significant differences in PONV and wound healing score between the 2 groups (P > .05).

conclusionsDexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for wound infiltration promoted the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, reduced sufentanil consumption, and had no effect on wound healing; it could be as an ideal adjuvant which could potentiate the analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmidesAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalChemotherapy, AdjuvantDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAmidesAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalDexmedetomidineRopivacaineSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID28930830
PMCPMC5617697
OpenAlexW2755382625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.