ArticleMedicine2017
Gatekeeping and the utilization of community health services in Shenzhen, China: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing health system efficiency in China: considering the interaction between use of primary care and the demand for secondary and tertiary care.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- The role of perceived quality of care on outpatient visits to health centers in two rural districts of northeast Ethiopia: a community-based, cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Can the allocation of primary health care system resources affect efficiency? A spatial Dubin model study in China.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Associations between Primary Healthcare Experiences and Glycemic Control Status in Patients with Diabetes: Results from the Greater Bay Area Study, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Association between resident status and patients' experiences of primary care: a cross-sectional study in the Greater Bay Area, China.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The Service Capability of Primary Health Institutions under the Hierarchical Medical System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fighting against COVID-19: preparedness and implications on clinical practice in primary care in Shenzhen, China.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations.Lancet (London, England) · 2020Review
- Article
- The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Organisation of primary health care systems in low- and middle-income countries: review of evidence on what works and why in the Asia-Pacific region.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the effects of the gatekeeper policy implemented in Shenzhen, China, in conjunction with a labor health insurance program, on channeling patients toward community health centers (CHCs).Eight thousand patients who visited 8 CHCs in Shenzhen were surveyed between May 1, 2013 and July 28, 2013. Half of the patients were subject to gatekeeper policy and the other half of them were not. Structured questionnaire was used to collect patients' choices of initial medical institution, use of CHCs and their satisfaction with health care. Bivariate and regression analyses were used to compare patient's choice, utilization, and satisfaction of CHCs.Compared with patients who were free to seek medical care at any place, patients with gatekeepers were 1.77 (95% CI 1.37-2.30) times more likely to choose CHCs first when seeking care. In the past year, the group with gatekeeper made 0.88 more visits to CHCs in the past year than the group without gatekeeper (P < .01), controlling for influencing factors. The 2 groups were equally satisfied with all satisfaction measures except for "waiting time," which was higher among patients without gatekeepers (P < .01).Our study indicates that, as repeatedly proven in other parts of the world, gatekeeping is effective in orienting patients toward primary care system. Along with increased efforts in rebuilding China's primary care network and expanding health insurance coverage, implementation of gatekeeper policy may help increase access to care, reduce inappropriate use of health resources, and strengthen primary care institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.