ArticleAnalytical chemistry2017
Continuous Sorting of Cells Based on Differential P Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand Expression Using Molecular Adhesion.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Microstructured Thermoresponsive Interfaces for Label-Free Cell Sorting Based on Nonspecific Interactions.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Label-free microfluidic isolation of functional and viable lymphocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- Scaling microfluidic throughput with flow-balanced manifolds to simply control devices with multiple inlets and outlets.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Article
- Stiffness based enrichment of leukemia cells using microfluidics.APL bioengineering · 2020Article
- Hydrodynamic shear-based purification of cancer cells with enhanced tumorigenic potential.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2020Article
- Accurately tracking single-cell movement trajectories in microfluidic cell sorting devices.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cell surface molecular adhesions govern many important physiological processes and are used to identify cells for analysis and purifications. But most effective cell adhesion separation technologies use labels or long-term attachments in their application. While label-free separation microsystems typically separate cells by size, stiffness, and shape, they often do not provide sufficient specificity to cell type that can be obtained from molecular expression. We demonstrate a label-free microfluidic approach capable of high throughput separation of cells based upon surface molecule adhesion. Cells are flowed through a microchannel designed with angled ridges at the top of the channel and coated with adhesive ligands specific to target cell receptors. The ridges slightly compress passing cells such that adhesive contact can be made with sufficient surface area without unduly affecting cell trajectories because of cell stiffness. Thus, sorting is sensitive to cell adhesion but not to stiffness or cell size. The enforced interactions between the cells and the ridges ensure that a high flow rate can be used without lift forces quenching adhesion. As a proof of principle of the method, we separate both Jurkat and HL60 cell lines based on their differential expression of PSGL-1 ligand by using a ridged channel coated with P selectin. We demonstrate 26-fold and 3.8-fold enrichment of PSGL-1 positive and 4.4-fold and 3.2-fold enrichment of PSGL-1 negative Jurkat and HL60 cells, respectively. Increasing the number of outlets to five allows for greater resolution in PSGL-1 selection resulting in fractionation of a single cell type into subpopulations of cells with high, moderate, and low PSGL-1 expression. The cells can flow at a rate of up to 0.2 m/s, which corresponds to 0.045 million cells per minute at the designed geometry, which is over 2 orders of magnitude higher than previous adhesive-based sorting approaches. Because of the short interaction time of the cells with the adhesive surfaces, the sorting method does not further activate the cells due to molecular binding. Such an approach may find use in label-free selection of cells for a highly expressed molecular phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.