Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929430›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2017

New Drugs in the Pipeline for the Treatment of HIV: a Review.

Leigh Anne Hylton Gravatt, Crystal R Leibrand, Sulay Patel, MaryPeace McRae

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leigh Anne Hylton GravattDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Crystal R LeibrandDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Sulay PatelDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
MaryPeace McRaeDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, VCU School of Pharmacy, 410 North 12th Street, PO Box 980533, Richmond, VA, 23298-0533, USA. mpmcrae@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USChildren's Hospital of Richmond at VCU · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this paper is to review therapies with new mechanisms of action for the treatment of HIV that are at least in phase 2 clinical trials. RECENT

findingsThere are several new mechanisms of action being represented within clinical development, including histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, gene therapies, broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibodies, immune modulation, and drugs with new mechanisms to block HIV entry. The new therapies are being developed for both as add-on therapy to existing combination antiretroviral therapy and as agents to be used during treatment interruption. The current drugs in development have had varying degrees of success in the early trials. Each of these new drugs may potentially fill a void in current antiretroviral therapy (ART) therapies, which will ultimately lead to improved outcomes in HIV-infected individuals.

Indexed as

Broadly neutralizing antibodyEntry inhibitorHistone deacetylase inhibitorsHIVPeg-interferon

Identifiers

PMID28929430
OpenAlexW2755506327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.