Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929343›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2017

A comparison of isomaltulose versus maltodextrin ingestion during soccer-specific exercise.

Emma J Stevenson, Anthony Watson, Stephan Theis, Anja Holz, Liam D Harper, Mark Russell

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sustainable isomaltulose production inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Isomaltulose Ingestion on Thermoregulatory Responses during Exercise in a Hot Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma J StevensonInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anthony WatsonHuman Nutrition Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Stephan TheisBENEO-Institute, Obrigheim/Pfalz, Wormserstrasse 11, Obrigheim, 67283, Germany.
Anja HolzBENEO-Institute, Obrigheim/Pfalz, Wormserstrasse 11, Obrigheim, 67283, Germany.
Liam D HarperHuman and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Mark RussellSchool of Social and Health Sciences, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, LS18 5HD, UK. m.russell@leedstrinity.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7305-1090
Newcastle University · GBLeeds Trinity University · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe performance and physiological effects of isomaltulose and maltodextrin consumed intermittently during prolonged soccer-specific exercise were investigated.

methodsUniversity soccer players (n = 22) performed 120 min of intermittent exercise while consuming 8% carbohydrate-electrolyte drinks (equivalent to ~ 20 g h

resultsBlood glucose and plasma insulin (both P < 0.001) concentrations varied by trial with isomaltulose maintaining > 13% higher blood glucose concentrations between 75 and 90 min versus maltodextrin (P < 0.05). A decline in glycaemia at 60 min in maltodextrin was attenuated with isomaltulose (-19 versus -4%; P = 0.015). Carbohydrates attenuated elevations in plasma epinephrine concentrations (P < 0.05), but isomaltulose proved most effective at 90 and 120 min. Carbohydrates did not attenuate IL-6 increases or reductions in physical or technical performances (all P > 0.05). Ratings of abdominal discomfort were influenced by trial (P < 0.05) with lower values for both carbohydrates compared to PLA from 60 min onwards.

conclusionsAlthough carbohydrates (~ 20 g h

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceExerciseAdministration, OralBlood GlucoseDrug Administration ScheduleEpinephrineHumansInsulinInterleukin-6IsomaltoseMalePolysaccharidesSoccerYoung AdultBlood GlucoseEpinephrineInsulinInterleukin-6IsomaltoseisomaltulosemaltodextrinPolysaccharidesCarbohydrateExtra-timeFootballHalf-timeRebound hypoglycaemia

Identifiers

PMID28929343
PMCPMC5700989
OpenAlexW2754556037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.