Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929306›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2017

Colorectal anastomotic leak: delay in reintervention after false-negative computed tomography scan is a reason for concern.

C C M Marres, A W H van de Ven, L G J Leijssen, P C M Verbeek, W A Bemelman, C J Buskens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Frontiers in surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. C-reactive protein (CRP) trajectory as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: A multicentre cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  15. Management of Acute Anastomotic Leaks.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  16. The importance of rectal contrast in CT assessment to detect anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  17. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Review
  20. A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C C M MarresDepartment of Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Hospitaalweg 1, 1315 RA, Almere, The Netherlands. cmarres@gmail.com.
A W H van de VenDepartment of Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Hospitaalweg 1, 1315 RA, Almere, The Netherlands.
L G J LeijssenDepartment of Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Hospitaalweg 1, 1315 RA, Almere, The Netherlands.
P C M VerbeekDepartment of Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Hospitaalweg 1, 1315 RA, Almere, The Netherlands.
W A BemelmanDepartment of Surgery, Academical Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C J BuskensDepartment of Surgery, Academical Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery followed by timely reintervention is of crucial importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) imaging for AL and the effects of delay in reintervention after a false-negative CT.

methodsAll files from patients who had colorectal surgery with primary anastomoses between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. The predictive value of CT scanning for AL was determined and correlated with short-term postoperative patient outcomes. In addition, factors predictive of false-negative scans were assessed.

resultsSix hundred and twenty-eight patient files were reviewed. In total, a CT scan was performed in 127 patients. Overall, leakage was seen in 49 patients (7.8%). The positive and negative predictive values were 78 and 88%, respectively. Sensitivity was 73% and specificity 91%. In patients with a true-positive CT (n = 24), reintervention followed after a median interval of 0 days (IQR 1), whereas this was 1 day (IQR 2) in the false-negative group (n = 11) (p < 0.05). This was associated with a significantly increased mortality rate (1/24 = 4.2% vs 5/11 = 45.5%) (p < 0.005), an increased length of hospital stay [median 28 days (IQR 26) vs 54 days (IQR 20) (p < 0.05)].

conclusionsDelayed reintervention after false-negative CT scanning is associated with a high mortality rate and a significant increase in length of hospital stay.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakColostomyDatabases, FactualEnemaFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesContrast MediaAnastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryComputed tomographyOncology

Identifiers

PMID28929306
PMCPMC5640761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.