ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2017
Chronic kidney disease and anticoagulation: from vitamin K antagonists and heparins to direct oral anticoagulant agents.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical effects of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Recurrent Stroke and Progression of Left Ventricular Thrombus During Apixaban Therapy in a Patient with Severe Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease.Drugs · 2024Review
- Therapeutic anticoagulation complications in the elderly: a case report.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Optimization of Heparin Monitoring with Anti-FXa Assays and the Impact of Dextran Sulfate for Measuring All Drug Activity.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- The use of anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease: Common point of view of cardiologists and nephrologists.Cardiology journal · 2020Review
- Anticoagulation in CKD and ESRD.Journal of nephrology · 2019Review
- Estimating renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: which dose of direct oral anticoagulants?Internal and emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Impact of chronic kidney disease on Watchman implantation: experience with 300 consecutive left atrial appendage closures at a single center.Heart and vessels · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticoagulation in patients with impaired kidney function can be challenging since drugs' pharmacokinetics and bioavailability are altered in this setting. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with conventional anticoagulant agents [vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH)] are at high risk of bleeding events (both non-major and major clinically relevant bleeding). While anticoagulation reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, the co-existing bleeding risk and the fact that the most commonly used anticoagulation agents are eliminated via the kidneys pose additional challenges. More recently, two classes of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) have been investigated for the prevention and management of venous thromboembolic events: the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. In this review, we discuss the complex challenges and the practical considerations associated with the management of anticoagulation treatment in patients with CKD, with a special focus on DOACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.