ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2017
Characterization of phenolic pellets for ESR dosimetry in photon beam radiotherapy.
Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing the Potential of Magnetic Resonance Dosimetry: The Case of Lithium Carbonate.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polyphenolic extracts from the xerophyte Rhamnus lycioides as a radiation biodosimeter.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- A new EPR dosimeter based on glutamic acid for radiation processing application.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work deals with the dosimetric features of a particular phenolic compound (IRGANOX 1076
Indexed as
Identifiers
28929295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.