Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929283›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018

Expanding the field of acute care surgery: a systematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in cases of morbidly adherent placenta.

R Manzano-Nunez, M F Escobar-Vidarte, M P Naranjo, F Rodriguez, P Ferrada, J D Casallas, C A Ordoñez

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hate to Burst Your Balloon: Successful REBOA Use Takes More Than a Course.Journal of endovascular resuscitation and trauma management · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R Manzano-NunezClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra 98 # 18-49, Cali, Colombia. ramiro.manzano@correounivalle.edu.co.
M F Escobar-VidarteDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
M P NaranjoClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra 98 # 18-49, Cali, Colombia.
F RodriguezDivision of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
P FerradaDepartment of Surgery and Surgical Critical Care Fellowship Program, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
J D CasallasClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra 98 # 18-49, Cali, Colombia.
C A OrdoñezDivision of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Fundación Valle del Lili · COUniversidad del Valle · COVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProphylactic placement of endovascular balloon occlusion catheters has grown to be part of the surgical plans to control intraoperative hemorrhage in cases of abnormal placentation. We performed a systematic literature review to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the use of REBOA during cesarean delivery in pregnant woman with morbidly adherent placenta.

methodsA systematic review was performed. Relevant case reports and nonrandomized studies were identified by the literature search in MEDLINE. We included studies involving pregnant woman with diagnosis of abnormal placentation who underwent cesarean delivery with REBOA placed for hemorrhage control. MINORS' criteria were used to evaluate the risk of bias of included studies. A formal meta-analysis was not performed.

resultsEight studies were included in cumulative results. These studies included a total of 392 patients. Overall, REBOA was deployed in 336 patients. Six studies reported the use of REBOA as an adjunct for prophylactic hemorrhage control in pregnant woman with diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta undergoing elective cesarean delivery. In two studies, REBOA was deployed in patients already in established hemorrhagic shock at the moment of cesarean delivery. REBOA was deployed primarily by interventional radiologists; however, one study reported a surgeon as the REBOA provider. The results from our qualitative synthesis indicate that the use of REBOA during cesarean delivery resulted in less blood loss with a low rate complications occurrence.

conclusionREBOA is a feasible, safe, and effective means of prophylactic and remedial hemorrhage control in pregnant women with abnormal placentation undergoing cesarean delivery.

Indexed as

AortaCesarean SectionPlacenta AccretaAdultBalloon OcclusionBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyResuscitationAbnormal placentationAcute care surgeryEndovascular proceduresPlacenta accretaREBOA

Identifiers

PMID28929283
OpenAlexW2756006585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.