Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929272›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2018

Hit, Robbed, and Put Down (but not Bullied): Underreporting of Bullying by Minority and Male Students.

Tianjian Lai, Grace Kao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the Olweus Bully Prevention Program in an Urban School System in the USA.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Third-Party Intervention in Peer Victimization: Self-Evaluative Emotions and Appraisals of a Diverse Adolescent Sample.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianjian LaiDepartment of Sociology, UCLA, 264 Haines Hall, 375 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. tianjian0lai@ucla.edu.
Grace KaoDepartment of Sociology, Yale University, 493 College Street, Room 407, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To tackle adolescent bullying and identify students most vulnerable to being bullied, it is essential to examine both occurrences of bullying behaviors and students' own likelihoods of reporting bullying. This study examines ethnic and gender differences in students' odds of reporting bullying using the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, a nationally representative study of United States high school sophomores (N = 15,362; ages 15-19; 50.2% female). Compared to White and female students, minority (particularly Black and Hispanic) and male students report comparable or greater experiences of bullying behaviors (such as being threatened, hit, put down by peers, or having belongings forced from them, stolen or damaged), but are less likely to report that they have been "bullied." These findings point to racialized and gendered differences in reporting bullying experiences such that indicators of "weakness" in peer relations may carry a greater stigma for minority and male students.

Indexed as

AdolescentBullyingCrime VictimsHumansInterpersonal RelationsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMinority GroupsPeer GroupSex FactorsStudentsUnited StatesViolenceBullyingGenderRaceSchool violenceVictimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.