Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929253›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2017

Positive rheotaxis extended drop: a one-step procedure to select and recover sperm with mature chromatin for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Hamilton De Martin, Marcello S Cocuzza, Bruno C Tiseo, Guilherme J A Wood, Eduardo P Miranda, Pedro A A Monteleone, José Maria Soares, Paulo C Serafini, Miguel Srougi, Edmund C Baracat

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biological benefits of collective swimming of sperm in a viscoelastic fluid.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamilton De MartinHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Marcello S CocuzzaHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil. mcocuzza@uol.com.br.
Bruno C TiseoHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Guilherme J A WoodHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Eduardo P MirandaHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Pedro A A MonteleoneHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
José Maria SoaresHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Paulo C SerafiniHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Miguel SrougiHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Edmund C BaracatHuman Reproduction Center, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a novel one-step ICSI approach to select sperm with better chromatin maturity than the conventional method.

methodsThis was a pilot diagnostic study, which prospectively recruited men during a 6-month period in a University-affiliated infertility centre. Forty consecutive semen samples were provided for analysis. The positive rheotaxis extended drop (PRED) was set up creating a pressure and viscosity gradient. Each semen sample was divided into four aliquots: one aliquot for density gradient centrifugation (DGC), two aliquots for PRED (fresh semen (PRED-FS) and processed semen (PRED-DGC)), and one aliquot as the control (FS). In PRED, a mean of 200 spermatozoa were collected consecutively without selection from the outlet reservoir. The aniline blue assay was used to assess chromatin immaturity.

resultsThe mean channel length, measured from inlet to outlet, was 32.55 ± 0.86 mm, with a mean width of 1.04 ± 0.21 mm. In 82.5% of cases (33/40), at least 50 spermatozoa were captured between 15 and 30 min. Improved chromatin maturity after the DGC preparation and the PRED approach was observed in all samples. This was reflected by a mean reduction from 28.65 ± 8.97% uncondensed chromatin in the native ejaculates to 17.29 ± 7.72% in DGC and 0.89 ± 1.31% in the PRED approach (P < 0.01).

conclusionsThe PRED method may improve the current ICSI technique by providing it with its own sperm selection process. ICSI would probably become an even more complete technique comprising selection, capture and injection of the male gamete.

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsRheologySperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultCentrifugation, Density GradientChromatinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSpermatozoaSperm MotilityYoung AdultChromatinIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionMenMicrofluidicsSpermatozoaSperm chromatin

Identifiers

PMID28929253
PMCPMC5714818
OpenAlexW2754822764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.