Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929208›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

PROMs in paediatric knee ligament injury: use the Pedi-IKDC and avoid using adult PROMs.

M Dietvorst, M Reijman, B van Groningen, M C van der Steen, R P A Janssen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05580315 (EPOS Discoid Meniscus), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05580315 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

EPOS Discoid Meniscus (DiMe) Project: a Prospective Multicentric Cohort Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2022 to 2042Enrolled500ConditionsDiscoid Meniscus of Knee
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M DietvorstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. martijndietvorst@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3581-287X
M ReijmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
B van GroningenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M C van der SteenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R P A JanssenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this systematic review was to present an evidence-based overview of psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for children with knee ligament injury.

methodsA systematic search of literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were diagnostic studies evaluating psychometric properties (validity, reliability, responsiveness) and comprehensibility of PROMs as well as studies including children (age < 18 years) with knee ligament injury. The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA statement.

resultsTen studies were included. Eight studies evaluated psychometric properties of PROMs, and two studies analysed comprehensibility of PROMs. The Pedi-IKDC has been evaluated in four studies and has acceptable psychometric properties. The KOOS-Child is evaluated in one study and has acceptable psychometric properties. The use of adult PROMs in children causes problems in comprehensibility.

conclusionThe Pedi-IKDC is an adequate PROM for children with knee ligament injuries. It is valid, reliable and responsive. The KOOS-Child might be an alternative PROM for the Pedi-IKDC, but has only been evaluated in one study. The clinical relevance of the present systematic review is that adult versions of PROMs are not recommended in children and adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultChildHumansKnee InjuriesLigaments, ArticularPsychometricsRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesKnee ligament injuryKOOS-ChildPaediatricPatient-reported outcome measuresPedi-IKDCPROMs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.