Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28929020›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Variance component testing for identifying differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq data.

Sheng Yang, Fang Shao, Weiwei Duan, Yang Zhao, Feng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheng Yang *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Fang Shao *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Weiwei DuanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Yang ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Feng ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) enables the measurement and comparison of gene expression with isoform-level quantification. Differences in the effect of each isoform may make traditional methods, which aggregate isoforms, ineffective. Here, we introduce a variance component-based test that can jointly test multiple isoforms of one gene to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes, especially those with isoforms that have differential effects. We model isoform-level expression data from RNA-Seq using a negative binomial distribution and consider the baseline abundance of isoforms and their effects as two random terms. Our approach tests the global null hypothesis of no difference in any of the isoforms. The null distribution of the derived score statistic is investigated using empirical and theoretical methods. The results of simulations suggest that the performance of the proposed set test is superior to that of traditional algorithms and almost reaches optimal power when the variance of covariates is large. This method is also applied to analyze real data. Our algorithm, as a supplement to traditional algorithms, is superior at selecting DE genes with sparse or opposite effects for isoforms.

Indexed as

Differentially expressed (DE)Generalized mixed linear model (GLMM)RNA-seqVariance component test (VCT)

Identifiers

PMID28929020
PMCPMC5592911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.