Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928856›Full record

ReviewJournal of Cancer2017

The Putative Role of

Andrzej Semczuk, Marek Gogacz, Anna Semczuk-Sikora, Maciej Jóźwik, Tomasz Rechberger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exon 4 and intron 4Biomedical reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Ovarian Cancer: Multi-Omics Data Integration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methylation of the SelectedJournal of Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrzej SemczukII ND Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Marek GogaczII ND Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Anna Semczuk-SikoraDepartment of Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Maciej JóźwikDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.
Tomasz RechbergerII ND Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLMedical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent an independent group among ovarian malignancies, being diagnosed at clinical stage earlier than invasive ovarian carcinomas (OCs) and characterized by a rather favorable outcome after careful surgical management. Data published worldwide showed a substantial discordance of p53 expression in BOTs. The purpose of this work was to present the current status of knowledge on the significance of

Indexed as

borderline ovarian tumorp53prognosis.TP53

Identifiers

PMID28928856
PMCPMC5604199
OpenAlexW2756053375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.