Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928836›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

Preoperative serum macrophage activated biomarkers soluble mannose receptor (sMR) and soluble haemoglobin scavenger receptor (sCD163), as novel markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Dongbing Ding, Yang Song, Yao Yao, Songbai Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Soluble mannose receptor induces proinflammatory macrophage activation and metaflammation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Expression ofTranslational cancer research · 2020
    Article
  15. Targeting of CD163International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongbing DingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jingmen First People's Hospital, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, P.R. China.
Yang SongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116023, P.R. China.
Yao YaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jingmen First People's Hospital, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, P.R. China.
Songbai ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jingmen First People's Hospital, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, P.R. China.
First People’s Hospital of Jingmen · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soluble mannose receptor (sMR) and soluble haemoglobin scavenger receptor (sCD163) are macrophage activation markers which have previously been demonstrated to be increased in patients with inflammation, auto-immunity and malignancies. To investigate the clinical diagnostic and prognostic significance of preoperative serum sMR and sCD163, the present study investigated 143 gastric cancer (GC) patients, 66 subjects with benign gastric disease and 59 healthy controls, using an ELISA assay. Preoperative serum levels of sMR and sCD163 ranged from 0.165 to 0.885 µg/ml (median=0.374 µg/ml) and from 0.291 to 1.760 µg/ml (median=0.628 µg/ml) in GC patients, respectively. The expression levels of sMR and sCD163 were elevated compared with all controls (P<0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses suggested that the optimum diagnostic cut-offs for sMR and sCD163 were 0.3405 µg/ml [area under curve (AUC) 0.7284, sensitivity 61.54%, and specificity 73.60%] and 0.6645 µg/ml (AUC 0.7766, sensitivity 53.85%, and specificity 86.40%), respectively. Notably, the measurement of serum sMR and sCD163 levels in conjugation, markedly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.8490, sensitivity 70.63% and specificity 84.00%). Preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 levels correlated significantly with serum carcinoembryonic antigen, CA199, CA724 and CA125 concentrations in GC patients (P<0.05), however this association was not observed with sMR and CA724. High preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 levels correlated significantly with shorter overall survival (P=0.0041; P<0.0001, respectively) and were demonstrated to act as adverse prognostic factors (P=0.006; P<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 levels correlated positively with the degree of lymphatic and distant metastasis of GC. In conclusion, preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 may be novel diagnostic and prognostic markers for GC and further studies are required in order to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms of sMR and CD163 in the development and progression of GC.

Indexed as

diagnosisgastric cancerprognosissCD163sMR

Identifiers

PMID28928836
PMCPMC5588128
OpenAlexW2729659600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.