ArticleOncology letters2017
Preoperative serum macrophage activated biomarkers soluble mannose receptor (sMR) and soluble haemoglobin scavenger receptor (sCD163), as novel markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is sCD163 a Clinical Significant Prognostic Value in Cancers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- The soluble mannose receptor (sMR/sCD206) in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infections, bacterial infections or non-infectious inflammation: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Clinical significance of circulating macrophage markers across different stages of prostate cancer: highlighting soluble CD163.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Soluble CD206 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Relation to clinical-biochemical parameters and patient outcome.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- sCD163, sCD28, sCD80, and sCTLA-4 as soluble marker candidates for detecting immunosenescence.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2024Review
- Impact and potential value of immunosenescence on solid gastrointestinal tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Innate IgM antibodies to mannose in patients with gastric cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2023Article
- Soluble CD163 predicts outcome in both chemoimmunotherapy and targeted therapy-treated mantle cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Combining sCD163 with CA 19-9 Increases the Predictiveness of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- Soluble Levels of CD163, PD-L1, and IL-10 in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization of Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases as a Prognostic Tool.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Soluble mannose receptor induces proinflammatory macrophage activation and metaflammation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- The Mannose Receptor: From Endocytic Receptor and Biomarker to Regulator of (Meta)Inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Expression ofTranslational cancer research · 2020Article
- Targeting of CD163International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Longitudinal expression profiling of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in patients with active to quiescent giant cell arteritis.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soluble mannose receptor (sMR) and soluble haemoglobin scavenger receptor (sCD163) are macrophage activation markers which have previously been demonstrated to be increased in patients with inflammation, auto-immunity and malignancies. To investigate the clinical diagnostic and prognostic significance of preoperative serum sMR and sCD163, the present study investigated 143 gastric cancer (GC) patients, 66 subjects with benign gastric disease and 59 healthy controls, using an ELISA assay. Preoperative serum levels of sMR and sCD163 ranged from 0.165 to 0.885 µg/ml (median=0.374 µg/ml) and from 0.291 to 1.760 µg/ml (median=0.628 µg/ml) in GC patients, respectively. The expression levels of sMR and sCD163 were elevated compared with all controls (P<0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses suggested that the optimum diagnostic cut-offs for sMR and sCD163 were 0.3405 µg/ml [area under curve (AUC) 0.7284, sensitivity 61.54%, and specificity 73.60%] and 0.6645 µg/ml (AUC 0.7766, sensitivity 53.85%, and specificity 86.40%), respectively. Notably, the measurement of serum sMR and sCD163 levels in conjugation, markedly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.8490, sensitivity 70.63% and specificity 84.00%). Preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 levels correlated significantly with serum carcinoembryonic antigen, CA199, CA724 and CA125 concentrations in GC patients (P<0.05), however this association was not observed with sMR and CA724. High preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 levels correlated significantly with shorter overall survival (P=0.0041; P<0.0001, respectively) and were demonstrated to act as adverse prognostic factors (P=0.006; P<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 levels correlated positively with the degree of lymphatic and distant metastasis of GC. In conclusion, preoperative serum sMR and sCD163 may be novel diagnostic and prognostic markers for GC and further studies are required in order to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms of sMR and CD163 in the development and progression of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.