ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2017
Efficacy of a leukotriene receptor antagonist for pediatric cedar pollen allergy complicated by asthma.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Focused allergic rhinitis practice parameter for Canada.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are identified as a monotherapy for asthma and allergic rhinitis; however, their use in children for treatment of these diseases has not been examined. Accordingly, the present study investigated the efficacy of pranlukast dry syrup for children with both pollinosis and asthma. The subjects were children receiving treatment for asthma who were also diagnosed with cedar pollen allergy. Patients were divided into a group that received continuous treatment with pranlukast (group A; n=20) and a group that commenced add-on treatment for pollinosis following the onset of symptoms (group B; n=20). Patients in group B were randomly allocated to subgroup B1 (add-on treatment with pranlukast dry syrup) or subgroup B2 (add-on treatment with a second-generation antihistamine). In both groups, nasal and ocular symptoms were evaluated every day and recorded in a diary. Exacerbation of nasal obstruction was demonstrated in group B; however, not in group A. There was a significant difference in symptoms observed between the two groups during the late peak pollen period (P<0.05). The incidence of nasal obstruction (defined as a nasal obstruction score ≥3 or use of a nasal steroid spray) was significantly lower in group A compared with group B (P<0.05). The maximum scores for sneezing and nasal obstruction during the late peak of the pollen season were lowest in group A, followed by subgroup B1 and subgroup B2. The present study demonstrated that long-term administration of LTRA for the management of asthma may improve nasal symptoms of pollinosis during the pollen season in children with pollinosis and asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.