Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928765›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Emerging Challenges and Opportunities for Education and Research in Weed Science.

Bhagirath S Chauhan, Amar Matloob, Gulshan Mahajan, Farhena Aslam, Singarayer K Florentine, Prashant Jha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Austrian farmers perception of new weeds.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Glyphosate Efficacy inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Weed competitive ability in wheat: a peek through in its functional significance, present status and future prospects.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bhagirath S ChauhanThe Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia.
Amar MatloobThe Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia.
Gulshan MahajanThe Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia.
Farhena AslamDepartment of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultan, Pakistan.
Singarayer K FlorentineCentre for Environmental Management, Faculty of Science and Technology, Federation University Australia, BallaratVIC, Australia.
Prashant JhaSouthern Agricultural Research Centre, Montana State University, BozemanMT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern agriculture, with more emphasis on high input systems, weed problems are likely to increase and become more complex. With heightened awareness of adverse effects of herbicide residues on human health and environment and the evolution of herbicide-resistant weed biotypes, a significant focus within weed science has now shifted to the development of eco-friendly technologies with reduced reliance on herbicides. Further, with the large-scale adoption of herbicide-resistant crops, and uncertain climatic optima under climate change, the problems for weed science have become multi-faceted. To handle these complex weed problems, a holistic line of action with multi-disciplinary approaches is required, including adjustments to technology, management practices, and legislation. Improved knowledge of weed ecology, biology, genetics, and molecular biology is essential for developing sustainable weed control practices. Additionally, judicious use of advanced technologies, such as site-specific weed management systems and decision support modeling, will play a significant role in reducing costs associated with weed control. Further, effective linkages between farmers and weed researchers will be necessary to facilitate the adoption of technological developments. To meet these challenges, priorities in research need to be determined and the education system for weed science needs to be reoriented. In respect of the latter imperative, closer collaboration between weed scientists and other disciplines can help in defining and solving the complex weed management challenges of the 21st century. This consensus will provide more versatile and diverse approaches to innovative teaching and training practices, which will be needed to prepare future weed science graduates who are capable of handling the anticipated challenges of weed science facing in contemporary agriculture. To build this capacity, mobilizing additional funding for both weed research and weed management education is essential.

Indexed as

advanced technologiesclimate changeherbicide resistanceintegrated weed managementresearch scientistweed ecologyweed research and education

Identifiers

PMID28928765
PMCPMC5591876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.