Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Re-challenge Studies in Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elena Lionetti, Alfredo Pulvirenti, Martina Vallorani, Giulia Catassi, Anil K Verma, Simona Gatti, Carlo Catassi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of gut microbiota profile in celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: An Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Biosimilars and the nocebo effect].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: people without celiac disease avoiding gluten-is it due to histamine intolerance?Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena LionettiDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Alfredo PulvirentiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Martina ValloraniDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Giulia CatassiDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Anil K VermaDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Simona GattiDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Carlo CatassiDepartment of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

challengeglutengluten-free dietgluten sensitivitynon-celiacplacebo

Identifiers

PMID28928668
PMCPMC5591881
OpenAlexW2753911964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.