Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928458›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Agonist immunotherapy restores T cell function following MEK inhibition improving efficacy in breast cancer.

Sathana Dushyanthen, Zhi Ling Teo, Franco Caramia, Peter Savas, Christopher P Mintoff, Balaji Virassamy, Melissa A Henderson, Stephen J Luen, Mariam Mansour, Michael H Kershaw and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sathana DushyanthenPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Zhi Ling TeoPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Franco CaramiaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Peter SavasPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Christopher P MintoffPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Balaji VirassamyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Melissa A HendersonPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Stephen J LuenPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Mariam MansourPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Michael H KershawPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Joseph A TrapaniPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Paul J NeesonPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Roberto SalgadoBreast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institute Jules Bordet, Brussels, 1000, Belgium.
Grant A McArthurPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Justin M BalkoBreast Cancer Research Program and Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Centre and Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Paul A BeavisPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. Paul.Beavis@petermac.org.
Phillip K DarcyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. phil.darcy@petermac.org.
Sherene LoiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUBreast Cancer Research Foundation · USInstitut Jules Bordet · BEUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers is correlated with improved outcomes. Ras/MAPK pathway activation is associated with significantly lower levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers and while MEK inhibition can promote recruitment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to the tumor, here we show that MEK inhibition adversely affects early onset T-cell effector function. We show that α-4-1BB and α-OX-40 T-cell agonist antibodies can rescue the adverse effects of MEK inhibition on T cells in both mouse and human T cells, which results in augmented anti-tumor effects in vivo. This effect is dependent upon increased downstream p38/JNK pathway activation. Taken together, our data suggest that although Ras/MAPK pathway inhibition can increase tumor immunogenicity, the negative impact on T-cell activity is functionally important. This undesirable impact is effectively prevented by combination with T-cell immune agonist immunotherapies resulting in superior therapeutic efficacy.MEK inhibition in breast cancer is associated with increased tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), however, MAPK activity is required for T cells function. Here the authors show that TILs activity following MEK inhibition can be enhanced by agonist immunotherapy resulting in synergic therapeutic effects.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy4-1BB LigandAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase 2MAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceOX40 LigandProtein Kinase Inhibitors4-1BB LigandMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase 2OX40 LigandProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinib

Identifiers

PMID28928458
PMCPMC5605577
OpenAlexW2754588487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.