Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Bacterial communities 16S rDNA fingerprinting as a potential tracing tool for cultured seabass Dicentrarchus labrax.

Tânia Pimentel, Joana Marcelino, Fernando Ricardo, Amadeu M V M Soares, Ricardo Calado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impacts of Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tetracycline-Resistant Bacteria Selected from Water and Zebrafish after Antibiotic Exposure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tânia PimentelDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM & ECOMARE, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. trpimentel@ua.pt.
Joana MarcelinoInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), DINÂMIA'CET, Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fernando RicardoDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM & ECOMARE, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Amadeu M V M SoaresDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM & ECOMARE, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Ricardo CaladoDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM & ECOMARE, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. rjcalado@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traceability of seafood has become crucial with market globalization and consumer's awareness. The present study used PCR-DGGE and 454 pyrosequencing to assess if bacterial communities fingerprint associated to seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) skin mucus can be used to discriminate the geographic origin of fishes cultured in three semi-intensive fish farms. PCR-DGGE and pyrosequencing results were congruent and suggested that this molecular approach has the potential to trace fish farms with a spatial resolution <500 m. Pyrosequencing results provided a detailed insight into the bacterial community composition of seabass skin mucus and revealed the existence of a core of bacterial communities within family Pseudomonadaceae and Rhodobacteraceae. This approach also allowed to recognized key OTUs that are potentially relevant to discriminate the geographic origin of the fish being surveyed. Overall, the present study increased our knowledge on farmed seabass microbiome and demonstrated that specific and unique bacterial taxa can act as natural signatures that allow us to trace fish to its respective geographic origin. Our study provides valuable clues that should be more investigated in future studies as a way to fulfill current traceability needs in the global trade of seafood.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingAnimalsAquacultureBacteriaBassDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28928412
PMCPMC5605529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.