Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928284›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2017

Functional and evolutionary insights from the

Wendy M Reeves, Yuye Wu, Matthew J Harder, Michael T Veeman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fine-Tuned Expression of Evolutionarily Conserved Signaling Molecules in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Degenerate Tale of Ascidian Tails.Integrative and comparative biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Brachyury controlsDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Fold Change Detection in Visual Processing.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy M ReevesDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Yuye WuDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Matthew J HarderDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Michael T VeemanDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA veeman@ksu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-6537
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Douglas E Wright · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Understanding the mechanobiology of stem cells in a microengineered 3D cardiac tissue environment with cardiomyopathyP20GM103638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI LUNTE, SUSAN M · 2012 to 2021
$22.1M
Morphogenetic effector networks in the Ciona notochordR01HD085909 · NICHD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VEEMAN, MICHAEL TERRENCE · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085909NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notochord of the ascidian

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBrachyury ProteinCiona intestinalisCytoskeletonEmbryo, NonmammalianExtracellular MatrixFetal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene OntologyIn Situ HybridizationMiceNotochordReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNAT-Box Domain ProteinsBrachyury ProteinFetal ProteinsT-Box Domain ProteinsCionaNotochordTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID28928284
PMCPMC5612257
OpenAlexW2760283324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.