Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928215›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Stalk-Specific Antibodies in Human Serum are a Surrogate Marker for

Henning Jacobsen, Madhusudan Rajendran, Angela Choi, Haakon Sjursen, Karl A Brokstad, Rebecca J Cox, Peter Palese, Florian Krammer, Raffael Nachbagauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. IgA and IgG1 Specific to Vi Polysaccharide ofFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Divergent humoral immune signatures in response to Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henning JacobsenDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Madhusudan RajendranDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4451-9608
Angela ChoiDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Haakon SjursenInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Karl A BrokstadDepartment of Clinical Science, Broeglemann Research Laboratory, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rebecca J CoxSection for Infectious Diseases, Medical Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Peter PaleseDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Florian KrammerDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-776X
Raffael NachbagauerDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA raffael.nachbagauer@mssm.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5568-5420
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Toward a Universal Influenza Virus VaccineP01AI097092 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI AHMED, RAFI · 2012 to 2022
$17.6M
Understanding Human B Cell Responses to Influenza to Improve the Influenza U19AI109946 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RAVETCH, JEFFREY VICTOR · 2014 to 2018
$9.6M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008CNIAID NIH HHS P01 AI097092NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunogenicity of current influenza virus vaccines is assessed by measuring an increase of influenza virus-specific antibodies in a hemagglutination inhibition assay. This method exclusively measures antibodies against the hemagglutinin head domain. While this domain is immunodominant, it has been shown that hemagglutination inhibition titers do not always accurately predict protection from disease. In addition, several novel influenza virus vaccines that are currently under development do not target the hemagglutinin head domain, but rather more conserved sites, including the hemagglutinin stalk. Importantly, antibodies against the hemagglutinin stalk do not show activity in hemagglutination inhibition assays and will require different methods for quantification. In this study, we tested human serum samples from a seasonal influenza virus vaccination trial and an avian H5N1 virus vaccination trial for antibody activities in multiple types of assays, including binding assays and also functional assays. We then performed serum transfer experiments in mice which then received an H1N1 virus challenge to assess the

Indexed as

Immunization, PassiveImmunogenicity, VaccineAdultAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicCross ReactionsDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBiomarkersHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza VaccinesADCCcorrelate of protectionELISAhemagglutininhemagglutinin stalkinfluenzainfluenza vaccinessurrogate markeruniversal influenza virus vaccine

Identifiers

PMID28928215
PMCPMC5605943
OpenAlexW2754303615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.