Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28928193›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

The course and prognostic factors of cognitive status after central nervous system trauma: a systematic review protocol.

Tatyana Mollayeva, Nicole Pacheco, Andrea D'Souza, Angela Colantonio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex-specific incident dementia in patients with central nervous system trauma.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tatyana MollayevaRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole PachecoAcquired Brain Injury Research Lab, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea D'SouzaAcquired Brain Injury Research Lab, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Angela ColantonioRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ontario Brain Institute · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR CGW126580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is among the most disabling injuries, resulting in a range of cognitive impairments. Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) often occurs in conjunction with TBI; the two are best considered together in the context of trauma to the central nervous system (CNS). Despite strong indications of cognitive dysfunction in CNS trauma, little is known about its natural history or relationship with other factors. The current protocol outlines a strategy for a systematic review of the current evidence examining CNS trauma as a prognostic factor of cognitive decline in the adult population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All peer-reviewed English language publications with a longitudinal design that focus on cognition in adults (ages 18 and older) with either TBI or SCI, or both from inception to December 2016 found through Medline, Central, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, supplemental PubMed and bibliographies of identified articles will be considered eligible. Quality will be evaluated using published guidelines. Results will be grouped by: (1) prognostic factors of cognitive deficits; and (2) development of, or time until development of, cognitive deficit in patients with CNS trauma. Close attention will be paid to the evaluative properties of the measurements used to assess cognition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The authors will publish findings from this review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal(s) and present the results at national and international conferences. This work will advance scientific certainty regarding natural history and prognostic factors of cognitive status in males and females with CNS trauma, informing clinicians, policymakers and future researchers on the topic. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017055309.

Indexed as

Research DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognition DisordersHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsSpinal Cord InjuriesTime FactorsAlzheimer’s diseasecognitionIa level of evidencemales, femalesnatural historyprognosissystematic reviewtraumatic brain injurytraumatic spinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID28928193
PMCPMC5623529
OpenAlexW2755847574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.