ArticleBMJ open2017
Development of core outcome sets for effectiveness trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium (Del-COrS): study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reporting of outcomes and measures in studies of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in older adults resident in long-term care: a systematic review.Age and ageing · 2022Pooled it
- Can we improve delirium prevention and treatment in the emergency department? A systematic review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Pooled it
- Patient-centred outcomes are under-reported in the critical care burns literature: a systematic review.Trials · 2022Pooled it
- Delirium-related distress in the ICU: A qualitative meta-synthesis of patient and family perspectives and experiences.International journal of nursing studies · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Heterogeneity in design and analysis of ICU delirium randomized trials: a systematic review.Trials · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in critically ill adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing intensive care unit delirium in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Antipsychotics for treatment of delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of narrative nursing on delirium and outcomes in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a randomized trial.Trials · 2025Trial
- Outcomes and measures in studies of techniques to promote secretion clearance in individuals with neuromuscular conditions: a scoping review.ERJ open research · 2025Review
- Core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent or treat delirium in long-term care older residents: international key stakeholder informed consensus study.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Advancing specificity in delirium: The delirium subtyping initiative.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Olanzapine for the treatment of ICU delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- Co-producing a multi-stakeholder Core Outcome Set for distal Tibia and Ankle fractures (COSTA): a study protocol.Trials · 2021Article
- Core outcomes sets for studies evaluating critical illness and patient recovery.Current opinion in critical care · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDelirium is a common, serious and potentially preventable condition with devastating impact on the quality of life prompting a proliferation of interventional trials. Core outcome sets aim to standardise outcome reporting by identifying outcomes perceived fundamental for measurement in trials of a specific interest area. Our aim is to develop international consensus on two core outcome sets for trials of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium, irrespective of study population. We aim to identify additional core outcomes specific to the critically ill, acutely hospitalised patients, palliative care and older adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review of published and ongoing delirium trials (1980 onwards) and one-on-one interviews of patients who have experienced delirium and family members. These data will inform Delphi round 1 of a two-stage consensus process. In round 2, we will provide participants their own response, summarised group responses and those of patient/family participants for rescoring. We will randomise participants to receive feedback as proportion scoring the outcome as critical or as group mean responses. We will hold a consensus meeting using nominal group technique to finalise outcomes for inclusion. We will repeat the Delphi process and consensus meeting to select measures for each core outcome. We will recruit 240 Delphi participants giving us 80% power to detect a 1.0-1.5 point (9-point scale) difference by feedback method between rounds. We will analyse differences for subsequent scores, magnitude of opinion change, items retained and level of agreement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We are obtaining research ethics approvals according to local governance. Participation will be voluntary and data deidentified. Support from three international delirium organisations will be instrumental in dissemination and core outcome set uptake. We will disseminate through peer-reviewed open access publications and present at conferences selected to reach a wide range of knowledge users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.