Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28927417›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2017

Automatic sleep staging using ear-EEG.

Kaare B Mikkelsen, David Bové Villadsen, Marit Otto, Preben Kidmose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From Scalp to Ear-EEG: A Generalizable Transfer Learning Model for Automatic Sleep Scoring in Older People.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. At-home sleep monitoring using generic ear-EEG.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaare B MikkelsenDepartment of Engineering, Aarhus University, Finlandsgade 22, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. mikkelsen.kaare@eng.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7360-8629
David Bové VilladsenDepartment of Engineering, Aarhus University, Finlandsgade 22, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Marit OttoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Preben KidmoseDepartment of Engineering, Aarhus University, Finlandsgade 22, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep and sleep quality assessment by means of sleep stage analysis is important for both scientific and clinical applications. Unfortunately, the presently preferred method, polysomnography (PSG), requires considerable expert assistance and significantly affects the sleep of the person under observation. A reliable, accurate and mobile alternative to the PSG would make sleep information much more readily available in a wide range of medical circumstances. NEW

methodUsing an already proven method, ear-EEG, in which electrodes are placed inside the concha and ear canal, we measure cerebral activity and automatically score the sleep into up to five stages. These results are compared to manual scoring by trained clinicians, based on a simultaneously recorded PSG.

resultsThe correspondence between manually scored sleep, based on the PSG, and the automatic labelling, based on ear-EEG data, was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Kappa values are in the range 0.5-0.8, making ear-EEG relevant for both scientific and clinical applications. Furthermore, a sleep-wake classifier with leave-one-out cross validation yielded specificity of 0.94 and sensitivity of 0.52 for the sleep stage. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Ear-EEG based scoring has clear advantages when compared to both the PSG and other mobile solutions, such as actigraphs. It is far more mobile, and potentially cheaper than the PSG, and the information on sleep stages is far superior to a wrist-based actigraph, or other devices based solely on body movement.

conclusionsThis study shows that ear-EEG recordings carry information about sleep stages, and indicates that automatic sleep staging based on ear-EEG can classify sleep stages with a level of accuracy that makes it relevant for both scientific and clinical sleep assessment.

Indexed as

EarElectroencephalographySleep StagesAdultAutomationElectrodesFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedEar-EEGEEGMobile EEGSleep scoring

Identifiers

PMID28927417
PMCPMC5606130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.