Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28927264›Full record

ArticleMolecules and cells2017

Comparative Interactomes of VRK1 and VRK3 with Their Distinct Roles in the Cell Cycle of Liver Cancer.

Namgyu Lee, Dae-Kyum Kim, Seung Hyun Han, Hye Guk Ryu, Sung Jin Park, Kyong-Tai Kim, Kwan Yong Choi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules and cells, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differential gene expression profile inJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Namgyu LeeDepartment of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea.
Dae-Kyum KimDonnelly Centre, Departments of Molecular Genetics and Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Seung Hyun HanDepartment of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea.
Hye Guk RyuDepartment of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea.
Sung Jin ParkDepartment of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea.
Kyong-Tai KimDepartment of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea.
Kwan Yong ChoiDepartment of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea.
Pohang University of Science and Technology · KRLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CAUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) and VRK3 are members of the VRK family of serine/threonine kinases and are principally localized in the nucleus. Despite the crucial roles of VRK1/VRK3 in physiology and disease, the molecular and functional interactions of VRK1/VRK3 are poorly understood. Here, we identified over 200 unreported VRK1/VRK3-interacting candidate proteins by affinity purification and LC-MS/MS. The networks of VRK1 and VRK3 interactomes were found to be associated with important biological processes such as the cell cycle, DNA repair, chromatin assembly, and RNA processing. Interactions of interacting proteins with VRK1/VRK3 were confirmed by biochemical assays. We also found that phosphorylations of XRCC5 were regulated by both VRK1/VRK3, and that of CCNB1 was regulated by VRK3. In liver cancer cells and tissues, VRK1/VRK3 were highly upregulated and its depletion affected cell cycle progression in the different phases. VRK3 seemed to affect S phase progression and G2 or M phase entry and exit, whereas VRK1 affects G1/S transition in the liver cancer, which could be explained by different interacting candidate proteins. Thus, this study not only provides a resource for investigating the unidentified functions of VRK1/VRK3, but also an insight into the regulatory roles of VRK1/VRK3 in biological processes.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCell ProliferationCyclin B1Gene Expression RegulationHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKu AutoantigenLiver NeoplasmsPhosphorylationProtein Interaction MapsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesCCNB1 protein, humanCyclin B1Intracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKu AutoantigenProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesVRK1 protein, humanVRK3 protein, humanXRCC5 protein, humanESI-MS/MSinteractomeVRK1VRK3

Identifiers

PMID28927264
PMCPMC5638770
OpenAlexW2917677506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.