Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28926634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Nasal and pharyngeal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus sciuri among hospitalised patients and healthcare workers in a Serbian university hospital.

Ivana Cirkovic, Jasmina Trajkovic, Tomasz Hauschild, Paal Skytt Andersen, Adebayo Shittu, Anders Rhod Larsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-ResistantThe East African health research journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic diversity ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ivana CirkovicInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-1824
Jasmina TrajkovicInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Tomasz HauschildDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Paal Skytt AndersenDepartment Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adebayo ShittuDepartment of Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Anders Rhod LarsenDepartment Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Statens Serum Institut · DKUniversity of Belgrade · RSObafemi Awolowo University · NGUniversity of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a paucity of data on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus sciuri (MRSS) epidemiology in European healthcare settings. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of nasal and pharyngeal carriage and diversity of MRSS among inpatients and healthcare workers (HCWs) in the largest healthcare centre in Serbia, and to assess performance of different methods for MRSS screening. Nasal and pharyngeal swabs were obtained from 195 patients and 105 HCWs in different departments. Each swab was inoculated directly onto MRSA-ID, oxacillin-resistance screening agar and mannitol salt agar (MSA) with 2 mg/L of oxacillin. After inoculation, each swab was dipped in Mueller-Hinton broth with 6.5% NaCl and after overnight incubation, subcultured onto oxacillin-MSA. Characterisation of isolated MRSS strains was determined by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PFGE, SCCmec typing and antimicrobial resistance genes detection. MRSS nasal and pharyngeal carriage rate was high (5%) in our hospital and department-variable. PFGE revealed a possible cross-transmission of MRSS between a patient and an HCW, and dissemination across hospital wards. All analysed isolates were multidrug resistant. Fusidic acid resistance was discovered in 93.7% of isolates, but fusA mutations in EF-G and fusB/C genes were not detected. SCCmec regions of MRSS contained elements of classic methicillin-resistant S. aureus type III. Broth enrichment prior to isolation on oxacillin-MSA was superior to direct cultivation on different media with a sensitivity/specificity of 100% and 88.5%, respectively. MRSS is a significant coloniser of patients and HCWs in the hospital. Further research is needed to investigate the clinical significance of the bacterium in our settings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial ProteinsCarrier StateHealth PersonnelHospitals, UniversityHumansMethicillin ResistanceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNasal CavityOxacillinPharynxSerbiaStaphylococcal InfectionsBacterial ProteinsOxacillin

Identifiers

PMID28926634
PMCPMC5605001
OpenAlexW2755859791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.