Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28926204›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2018

Acceptability of Clinical Decision Support Interface Prototypes for a Nursing Electronic Health Record to Facilitate Supportive Care Outcomes.

Janet Stifter, Vanessa E C Sousa, Alessandro Febretti, Karen Dunn Lopez, Andrew Johnson, Yingwei Yao, Gail M Keenan, Diana J Wilkie

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janet StifterPostdoctoral Scholar at the College of Nursing.
Vanessa E C SousaPostdoctoral Scholar at the College of Nursing.
Alessandro FebrettiPhD Candidate at the Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering.
Karen Dunn LopezAssistant Professor at the College of Nursing.
Andrew JohnsonAssociate Professor and Director of Research at the Electronic Visualization Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering.
Yingwei YaoResearch Associate Professor at the College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and at the College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Gail M KeenanAdjunct Professor at the College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and the Annabel Davis Jenks Endowed Professor for Teaching and Research in Nursing Clinical Excellence at the College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Diana J WilkieAdjunct Professor at the College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and Professor at Prairieview Trust - Earl and Margo Powers Endowed Professor, and Director of the Academic Center of Excellence in Palliative Care Research and Education, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-8933

Funding

Describing, Contrasting, and Visualizing End-of-Life Care in the 21st CenturyR01NR012949 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ANSARI, RASHID, KEENAN, GAIL M · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
National Institute of Nursing Research 1R01 NR012949NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the acceptability, usefulness, and ease of use for four nursing clinical decision support interface prototypes.

methodsIn a simulated hospital environment, 60 registered nurses (48 female; mean age = 33.7 ± 10.8; mean years of experience = 8.1 ± 9.7) participated in a randomized study with four study groups. Measures included acceptability, usefulness, and ease of use scales.

findingsMean scores were high for acceptability, usefulness, and the ease of use for all four groups. Inexperienced participants (<1 year) reported higher perceived ease of use (p = .05) and perceived usefulness (p = .01) than those with experience of 1 year or more.

conclusionsParticipants completed the protocol and reported that all four interfaces, including the control (HANDS), were acceptable, easy to use, and useful. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING KNOWLEDGE: Further study is warranted before clinical implementation within the electronic health record.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsNursing RecordsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUser-Computer InterfaceYoung AdultClinical decision supportelectronic health recordend-of-life careinterface usabilitypractice-based evidencesimulation

Identifiers

PMID28926204
PMCPMC5858953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.