Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28925968›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Recent Progress in the Development of Diagnostic Tests for Malaria.

Francis D Krampa, Yaw Aniweh, Gordon A Awandare, Prosper Kanyong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Remoscope: a label-free imaging cytometer for malaria diagnostics.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Expression, Purification, and Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Malaria: An Overview.Infection and drug resistance · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Trends of neglectedOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francis D KrampaWest African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens (WACCBIP), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana. fkrampa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5011-8686
Yaw AniwehWest African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens (WACCBIP), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana. aniweh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8415-2727
Gordon A AwandareWest African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens (WACCBIP), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana. gawandare@ug.edu.gh.
Prosper KanyongWest African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens (WACCBIP), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana. p.kanyong@waccbip.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2414-6197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of malaria on global health has continually prompted the need to develop effective diagnostic strategies. In malaria endemic regions, routine diagnosis is hampered by technical and infrastructural challenges to laboratories. These laboratories lack standard facilities, expertise or diagnostic supplies; thus, therapy is administered based on clinical or self-diagnosis. There is the need for accurate diagnosis of malaria due to the continuous increase in the cost of medication, and the emergence and spread of drug resistant strains. However, the widely utilized Giemsa-stained microscopy and immunochromatographic tests for malaria are liable to several drawbacks, including inadequate sensitivity and false-positive outcomes. Alternative methods that offer improvements in performance are either expensive, have longer turnaround time or require a level of expertise that makes them unsuitable for point-of-care (POC) applications. These gaps necessitate exploration of more efficient detection techniques with the potential of POC applications, especially in resource-limited settings. This minireview discusses some of the recent trends and new approaches that are seeking to improve the clinical diagnosis of malaria.

Indexed as

aldolasebiosensingdisposal medical deviceshistidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)infectious diseaseslactate dehydrogenase (LDH)lateral flow assaysmultiplex biomarker detectionPlasmodium spp.point-of-care tests (POCT)rapid diagnostic tests (RDT)

Identifiers

PMID28925968
PMCPMC5617953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.