Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28925354›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Dynamic representation of partially occluded objects in primate prefrontal and visual cortex.

Amber M Fyall, Yasmine El-Shamayleh, Hannah Choi, Eric Shea-Brown, Anitha Pasupathy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recurrent computations for visual pattern completion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prefrontal Mechanisms of Rule Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Partial Occlusion on Response Dynamics and Interregional Processing within Primate Superior Temporal Sulcus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Responses of neurons in macaque V4 to object and texture images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontotemporal network contribution to occluded face processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multisensory interactions of face and vocal information during perception and memory in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Learning a Model of Shape Selectivity in V4 Cells Reveals Shape Encoding Mechanisms in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amber M FyallDepartment of BIological Structure, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Yasmine El-ShamaylehPhysiology and Biophysics, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-2823
Hannah ChoiApplied Mathematics, University of Washington Institute for Neuroengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-1121
Eric Shea-BrownDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Anitha PasupathyDepartment of BIological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3808-8063

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
The role of area V4 in the perception and recognition of visual objectsR01EY018839 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Anitha Pasupathy · 2009 to 2026
$9.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018839NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful recognition of partially occluded objects is presumed to involve dynamic interactions between brain areas responsible for vision and cognition, but neurophysiological evidence for the involvement of feedback signals is lacking. Here, we demonstrate that neurons in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) of monkeys performing a shape discrimination task respond more strongly to occluded than unoccluded stimuli. In contrast, neurons in visual area V4 respond more strongly to unoccluded stimuli. Analyses of V4 response dynamics reveal that many neurons exhibit two transient response peaks, the second of which emerges after vlPFC response onset and displays stronger selectivity for occluded shapes. We replicate these findings using a model of V4/vlPFC interactions in which occlusion-sensitive vlPFC neurons feed back to shape-selective V4 neurons, thereby enhancing V4 responses and selectivity to occluded shapes. These results reveal how signals from frontal and visual cortex could interact to facilitate object recognition under occlusion.

Indexed as

CognitionVisual PerceptionAnimalsElectroencephalographyMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalPrefrontal CortexVisual Cortexfeedback signalsneurophysiologyneuroscienceobject representation and recognitionpartial occlusionprefrontal cortexrhesus macaquevisual area V4

Identifiers

PMID28925354
PMCPMC5605274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.