ReviewMolecular nutrition & food research2018
Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps.
Review in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of plant food allergens using protein embeddings.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- The ALLPreT panel of legume allergen preparations: characterization of optimized protein extracts for allergen composition, IgE-binding and IgE-crosslinking properties.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Enhancing allergenicity risk assessment for novel foods in the EU: insights from the updated EFSA guidance - requirements, knowledge gaps and research needs.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Review
- Article
- Novel foods: allergenicity assessment of insect proteins.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Plant Allergens?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Animal Allergens?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Digestion and Transport across the Intestinal Epithelium Affects the Allergenicity of Ara h 1 and 3 but Not of Ara h 2 and 6.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2021Article
- Two Faces of Milk Proteins Peptides with Both Allergenic and Multidimensional Health Beneficial Impact- IntegratedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Rare food allergens.Allergologie select · 2021Review
- Ranking of 10 legumes according to the prevalence of sensitization as a parameter to characterize allergenic proteins.Toxicology reports · 2021Article
- Review
- New Perspectives in Food Allergy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Review
- COST Action 'ImpARAS': what have we learnt to improve food allergy risk assessment. A summary of a 4 year networking consortium.Clinical and translational allergy · 2020Review
- Homologous tropomyosins from vertebrate and invertebrate: Recombinant calibrator proteins in functional biological assays for tropomyosin allergenicity assessment of novel animal foods.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020Article
- Insects in food and feed - allergenicity risk assessment and analytical detection.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- The antioxidant components of milk and their role in processing, ripening, and storage: Functional food.Veterinary world · 2019Article
- Progress on Identifying and Characterizing the Human Proteome: 2018 Metrics from the HUPO Human Proteome Project.Journal of proteome research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food allergies are recognized as a global health concern. In order to protect allergic consumers from severe symptoms, allergenic risk assessment for well-known foods and foods containing genetically modified ingredients is installed. However, population is steadily growing and there is a rising need to provide adequate protein-based foods, including novel sources, not yet used for human consumption. In this context safety issues such as a potential increased allergenic risk need to be assessed before marketing novel food sources. Therefore, the established allergenic risk assessment for genetically modified organisms needs to be re-evaluated for its applicability for risk assessment of novel food proteins. Two different scenarios of allergic sensitization have to be assessed. The first scenario is the presence of already known allergenic structures in novel foods. For this, a comparative assessment can be performed and the range of cross-reactivity can be explored, while in the second scenario allergic reactions are observed toward so far novel allergenic structures and no reference material is available. This review summarizes the current analytical methods for allergenic risk assessment, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method and discussing the gaps in this assessment that need to be addressed in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.