Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28924863›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2018

Evaluation of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer patients: is dual-energy CT an option?

Stefania Rizzo, Marco Femia, Davide Radice, Maria Del Grande, Dorella Franchi, Daniela Origgi, Valentina Buscarino, Alberto Mauro, Massimo Bellomi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Endometrial cancer: an overview of novelties in treatment and related imaging keypoints for local staging.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefania RizzoDepartment of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. stefania.rizzo@ieo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-0866
Marco FemiaPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Davide RadiceDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ramusio 1, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Maria Del GrandeOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, San Giovanni Hospital, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Dorella FranchiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Daniela OriggiMedical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Valentina BuscarinoPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Alberto MauroGE Healthcare Italia SpA, Via Galeno 36, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Massimo BellomiDepartment of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Ripamonti · ITUniversity of Milan · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITOspedale San Giovanni Bellinzona · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAssessment of deep (>50%) myometrial invasion by dual-energy CT (DECT) and Trans-Vaginal US (TVUS) in patients with endometrial cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients with endometrial cancer who underwent DECT and TVUS for pre-surgical staging. Three sets of images were evaluated: 70 keV (routine CT images), 50 keV, and iodine-water reconstructions. The gold standard was pathology after surgery. The agreement between the different imaging modalities and the gold standard was estimated. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each imaging modality were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsThirty-nine patients were included. Median time from CT and TVUS to surgery was 23 and 18 days, respectively. The best agreement between evaluation of myometrial infiltration and the gold standard was 0.88 (0.72, 1.00) for the 50 keV images; the worst agreement was 0.43 (0.00, 0.88) for the 70 keV images. CT iodine reconstructions and US agreement were comparable. Specificity, sensitivity and accuracy were 0.91, 1.00, 0.94; 0.57, 0.86, 0.71; 0.82, 1.00, 0.87; 0.91, 0.77, 0.86 for 50 keV, 70 keV, iodine reconstructions and ultrasound, respectively.

conclusionsDECT is a promising tool for assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer patients, with a special focus on 50 keV images.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMyometriumNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesUterine NeoplasmsDual Energy CTEndometrial cancerImagingMyometrial invasionUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID28924863
OpenAlexW2754395652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.