Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28924829›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2017

A Comparison of Drug Transport in Pulmonary Absorption Models: Isolated Perfused rat Lungs, Respiratory Epithelial Cell Lines and Primary Cell Culture.

Cynthia Bosquillon, Michaela Madlova, Nilesh Patel, Nicola Clear, Ben Forbes

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biopharmaceutical profiling of anti-infective sanggenons fromInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Modifying and IntegratingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia BosquillonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Boots Science Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Michaela MadlovaKing's College London, Pharmaceutical Science Division, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Nilesh PatelSchool of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK.
Nicola ClearPfizer R&D, Sandwich, Kent, CT13 9NJ, UK.
Ben ForbesKing's College London, Pharmaceutical Science Division, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK. ben.forbes@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-6107
King's College London · GBPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the ability of human airway epithelial cell layers and a simple rat isolated perfused lung (IPL) model to predict pulmonary drug absorption in rats in vivo.

methodThe permeability of seven compounds selected to possess a range of lipophilicity was measured in two airway cell lines (Calu-3 and 16HBE14o-), in normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells and using a simple isolated perfused lungs (IPL) technique. Data from the cell layers and ex vivo lungs were compared to published absorption rates from rat lungs measured in vivo.

resultsA strong relationship was observed between the logarithm of the in vivo absorption half-life and the absorption half-life in the IPL (r = 0.97; excluding formoterol). Good log-linear relationships were also found between the apparent first-order absorption rate in vivo and cell layer permeability with correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.93, 0.91 in Calu-3, 16HBE14o- and NHBE cells, respectively.

conclusionThe simple IPL technique provided a good prediction of drug absorption from the lungs, making it a useful method for empirical screening of drug absorption in the lungs. Permeability measurements were similar in all the respiratory epithelial cell models evaluated, with Calu-3 having the advantage for routine permeability screening purposes of being readily availability, robust and easy to culture.

Indexed as

Respiratory Tract AbsorptionAlveolar Epithelial CellsAnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedHumansLungMaleModels, BiologicalPrimary Cell CultureRats, Wistar16HBE14o-biopharmaceuticscalu-3inhalationisolated perfused lungs (IPL)NHBEpermeabilitypulmonary

Identifiers

PMID28924829
PMCPMC5736767
OpenAlexW2754585514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.