Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28924737›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2018

Contribution to the anatomical nomenclature concerning lower limb anatomy.

David Kachlik, Vladimir Musil, Vaclav Baca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Towards a Terminologia Anatomica Humana.Anatomical science international · 2024
    Article
  5. A plea for extension of the anatomical nomenclature: Vessels.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Variant Anatomy and Its Terminology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Review
  7. Iliocapsularis muscle in human fetuses.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2019
    Article
  8. A plea for an extension of the anatomical nomenclature: Organ systems.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David KachlikDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Vladimir MusilCentre of Scientific Information, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague 10, Czech Republic. vladimir.musil@lf3.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0107-690X
Vaclav BacaDepartment of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Tolstého 1556/16, 586 01, Jihlava, Czech Republic.

Funding

Univerzita Karlova v Praze Progres Q37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this article is to extend and revise the sections of Terminologia Anatomica (TA) dealing with the lower limb structures and to justify the use of newly proposed anatomical terms in clinical medicine, education, and research.

methodsAnatomical terms were gathered during our educational experience from anatomical textbooks and journals and compared with the four previous editions of the official Latin anatomical nomenclature.

resultsThe authors summarise 270 terms with their definitions and explanations for both constant and variable morphological structures (bones, joints, muscles, vessels, nerves and superficial structures) of the hip, thigh, knee, leg, ankle, and foot completed with several grammatical remarks and some general anatomical terms.

conclusionThe proposed terms should be discussed in wider anatomical community and potentially added to next edition of the TA.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicHumansLower ExtremityAnatomical nomenclatureAnatomical terminologyLower limbTerminologia AnatomicaVariation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.