Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28924628›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2017

A recurrent neural model for proto-object based contour integration and figure-ground segregation.

Brian Hu, Ernst Niebur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Connectivity concepts in neuronal network modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian HuZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. bhu6@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-8762
Ernst NieburZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.

Funding

CRCNS: Neural decision mechanisms: from value-encoding to preference reversalR01DA040990 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NIEBUR, ERNST, STUPHORN, VEIT · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
CRCNS:Proto-object based perceptual organization in three dimensionsR01EY027544 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ETIENNE-CUMMINGS, RALPH, NIEBUR, ERNST · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027544NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040990NIH HHS R01DA040990NIH HHS R01EY027544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual processing of objects makes use of both feedforward and feedback streams of information. However, the nature of feedback signals is largely unknown, as is the identity of the neuronal populations in lower visual areas that receive them. Here, we develop a recurrent neural model to address these questions in the context of contour integration and figure-ground segregation. A key feature of our model is the use of grouping neurons whose activity represents tentative objects ("proto-objects") based on the integration of local feature information. Grouping neurons receive input from an organized set of local feature neurons, and project modulatory feedback to those same neurons. Additionally, inhibition at both the local feature level and the object representation level biases the interpretation of the visual scene in agreement with principles from Gestalt psychology. Our model explains several sets of neurophysiological results (Zhou et al. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(17), 6594-6611 2000; Qiu et al. Nature Neuroscience, 10(11), 1492-1499 2007; Chen et al. Neuron, 82(3), 682-694 2014), and makes testable predictions about the influence of neuronal feedback and attentional selection on neural responses across different visual areas. Our model also provides a framework for understanding how object-based attention is able to select both objects and the features associated with them.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAttentionFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PerceptionContour processingFeedbackGroupingPerceptual organizationRecurrent processingShape perception

Identifiers

PMID28924628
PMCPMC5693639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.