Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28924608›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

A versatile 3D tissue matrix scaffold system for tumor modeling and drug screening.

Girdhari Rijal, Weimin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dynamic Hydrogels in Breast Tumor Models.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Organoids technology in cancer research: from basic applications to advancedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advanced Hydrogels in Breast Cancer Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Girdhari RijalDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8933-5111
Weimin LiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the anticancer drug candidates entering preclinical trials fail to be approved for clinical applications. The following are among the main causes of these failures: studying molecular mechanisms of cancer development, identifying therapeutic targets, and testing drug candidates using inappropriate tissue culture models, which do not recapitulate the native microenvironment where the cancer cells originate. It has become clear that three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures are more biologically and clinically relevant than 2D models. The spatial and mechanical conditions of 3D cultures enable the cancer cells to display heterogeneous growth, assume diverse phenotypes, express distinct gene and protein products, and attain metastatic potential and resistance to drugs that are reminiscent of tumors in humans. However, the current 3D culture systems using synthetic polymers or selected components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are defective (particularly the biophysical and biochemical properties of the native ECM) and remain distant to optimally support the signaling cue-oriented cell survival and growth. We introduce a reconstitutable tissue matrix scaffold (TMS) system fabricated using native tissue ECM, with tissue-like architecture and resilience. The structural and compositional properties of TMS favor robust cell survival, proliferation, migration, and invasion in culture and vascularized tumor formation in animals. The combination of porous and hydrogel TMS allows compartmental culture of cancerous and stromal cells, which are distinguishable by biomarkers. The response of the cancer cells grown on TMS to drugs well reflects animal and clinical observations. TMS enables more biologically relevant studies and is suitable for preclinical drug screening.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixTissue Culture TechniquesTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansHydrogelsMiceStromal CellsAntineoplastic AgentsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID28924608
PMCPMC5597314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.