ArticlePeerJ2017
Greater reproductive investment, but shorter lifespan, in agrosystem than in natural-habitat toads.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- When time turns the tide: the interactive effects of ammonium and warming during the larval stage on the resulting adult frogs.Frontiers in zoology · 2025Article
- Body size and condition, not allochrony, affect temporal reproductive patterns in a prolonged breeding anuran.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Demographic and Life-History Responses ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Compensatory recruitment allows amphibian population persistence in anthropogenic habitats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Non-destructive methods to assess health of wild tropical frogs (túngara frogs: Engystomops pustulosus) in Trinidad reveal negative impacts of agricultural land.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Integrating time progression in ecoimmunology studies: beyond immune response intensity.Current zoology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global amphibian decline is due to several factors: habitat loss, anthropization, pollution, emerging diseases, and global warming. Amphibians, with complex life cycles, are particularly susceptible to habitat alterations, and their survival may be impaired in anthropized habitats. Increased mortality is a well-known consequence of anthropization. Life-history theory predicts higher reproductive investment when mortality is increased. In this work, we compared age, body size, and different indicators of reproductive investment, as well as prey availability, in natterjack toads (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.