ArticlePeerJ2017
Factors influencing healthcare provider respondent fatigue answering a globally administered in-app survey.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of e-health interventions for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Co-design of a novel rehabilitation intervention for patients after ankle fracture surgery: establishing healthcare professional consensus.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2025Trial
- Randomized Prospective Trial Exploring the Impact of Structured Journaling in Patients With Sarcoma on the Management of Treatment-Related Adverse Events.JCO oncology practice · 2022Trial
- Association Between Patient Health Questionnaire-4 Composite Score and Depression Diagnoses in a Free Clinic Setting: Pooled Cross-sectional Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Entrustable Professional Activities for Pharmacists Carrying Out Medication Management Reviews.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Respondent fatigue in clinical practice: exploring the challenges of increasing PROMS and PREMS utilization in a tertiary hospital.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- PERSPECTIVES OF CLINICAL DENTAL STUDENTS AND GRADUATES ON THE STANDARD OF CLINICAL TRAINING AT IBADAN DENTAL SCHOOL.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2026Article
- The Utility of Automated, Data-Driven Clinical Support in Telemedicine for Critical Illness: A Survey-Based Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Patient and Cross-Disciplinary Expert Single-Round Surveys.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Establishing Psychometric Properties of the Modified Barriers Experienced in Providing Healthcare Instrument.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "Please speak in Hindi": Cognitive interviews to improve measurement of digital access in North India.PloS one · 2026Article
- Exploring the influence of social media 'Mumfluencers' on postpartum body image.Journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Protocol to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of a chaplain-delivered compassion intervention to improve psychological safety among interprofessional healthcare teams.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- "My world has shrunk": a mixed-methods exploration of the impact of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases on patients' lives.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Chemical Prioritisation for Human Biomonitoring in Ireland: A Synergy of Global Frameworks and Local Perspectives.Toxics · 2025Article
- Associations between diet quality indices and psoriasis severity: results from the Asking People with Psoriasis about Lifestyle and Eating (APPLE) cross-sectional study.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- A Practical Guide for Improving and Evaluating the Components of Emotional Intelligence in Healthcare Students.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Delphi survey to gather feedback on a CONSORT extension proposal for nutrition intervention trials.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Testing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Platform in the Context of Traumatic Brain Injury: PRiORiTy Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespondent fatigue, also known as survey fatigue, is a common problem in the collection of survey data. Factors that are known to influence respondent fatigue include survey length, survey topic, question complexity, and open-ended question type. There is a great deal of interest in understanding the drivers of physician survey responsiveness due to the value of information received from these practitioners. With the recent explosion of mobile smartphone technology, it has been possible to obtain survey data from users of mobile applications (apps) on a question-by-question basis. The author obtained basic demographic survey data as well as survey data related to an anesthesiology-specific drug called sugammadex and leveraged nonresponse rates to examine factors that influenced respondent fatigue.
methodsPrimary data were collected between December 2015 and February 2017. Surveys and in-app analytics were collected from global users of a mobile anesthesia calculator app. Key independent variables were user country, healthcare provider role, rating of importance of the app to personal practice, length of time in practice, and frequency of app use. Key dependent variable was the metric of respondent fatigue.
resultsProvider role and World Bank country income level were predictive of the rate of respondent fatigue for this in-app survey. Importance of the app to the provider and length of time in practice were moderately associated with fatigue. Frequency of app use was not associated. This study focused on a survey with a topic closely related to the subject area of the app. Respondent fatigue rates will likely change dramatically if the topic does not align closely. DISCUSSION: Although apps may serve as powerful platforms for data collection, responses rates to in-app surveys may differ on the basis of important respondent characteristics. Studies should be carefully designed to mitigate fatigue as well as powered with the understanding of the respondent characteristics that may have higher rates of respondent fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.