Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28924008›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Primary Generators of Visually Evoked Field Potentials Recorded in the Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Yoshinao Kajikawa, John F Smiley, Charles E Schroeder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Visual Stimuli Modulate Local Field Potentials But Drive No High-Frequency Activity in Human Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of Scalp ERP to Faces in Macaques and Humans.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshinao KajikawaTranslational Neuroscience Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962, ykajikawa@nki.rfmh.org.
John F SmileyDepartment of Neurochemistry, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962.
Charles E SchroederTranslational Neuroscience Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962.
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USCognitive Research (United States) · US

Funding

Neurophysiology and Anatomy of Multisensory ProcessingR01DC011490 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI HACKETT, TROY A., SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
neurophysiology behavioral role and organization of the auditory parabeltR01DC015780 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI KAJIKAWA, YOSHINAO · 2017 to 2023
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011490NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies have reported "local" field potential (LFP) responses to faces in the macaque auditory cortex and have suggested that such face-LFPs may be substrates of audiovisual integration. However, although field potentials (FPs) may reflect the synaptic currents of neurons near the recording electrode, due to the use of a distant reference electrode, they often reflect those of synaptic activity occurring in distant sites as well. Thus, FP recordings within a given brain region (e.g., auditory cortex) may be "contaminated" by activity generated elsewhere in the brain. To determine whether face responses are indeed generated within macaque auditory cortex, we recorded FPs and concomitant multiunit activity with linear array multielectrodes across auditory cortex in three macaques (one female), and applied current source density (CSD) analysis to the laminar FP profile. CSD analysis revealed no appreciable local generator contribution to the visual FP in auditory cortex, although we did note an increase in the amplitude of visual FP with cortical depth, suggesting that their generators are located below auditory cortex. In the underlying inferotemporal cortex, we found polarity inversions of the main visual FP components accompanied by robust CSD responses and large-amplitude multiunit activity. These results indicate that face-evoked FP responses in auditory cortex are not generated locally but are volume-conducted from other face-responsive regions. In broader terms, our results underscore the caution that, unless far-field contamination is removed, LFPs in general may reflect such "far-field" activity, in addition to, or in absence of, local synaptic responses.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleMacacaMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationRandom AllocationReaction Timeauditory cortexface responsefield potentialinferotemporal cortexmacaque monkeyvolume conduction

Identifiers

PMID28924008
PMCPMC5647771
OpenAlexW2754001786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.