ArticleBioscience reports2017
The role of
Article in Bioscience reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- C-Reactive Protein Signaling Pathways in Tumor Progression.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2023Review
- ASCL2 Maintains Stemness Phenotype through ATG9B and Sensitizes Gliomas to Autophagy Inhibitor.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Development of an Autophagy-Related Gene Prognostic Model and Nomogram for Estimating Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Survival.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Hydroxychloroquine Potentiates Apoptosis Induced by PPARPPAR research · 2021Article
- The Basic Characteristics of the Pentraxin Family and Their Functions in Tumor Progression.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Article
- Acute phase protein response to viral infection and vaccination.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2019Review
- Relationship Between Serum Inflammatory Factor Levels and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Image · Euphemisms for Plagiarism · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Plagiarism of Data · Plagiarism of Image · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/C60F1E45B4A3231272C5EF29F3712D
- Expression of concern · 2023-04-06Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Image · Euphemisms for Plagiarism · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Plagiarism of Data · Plagiarism of Image · Updated to Retraction · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/C60F1E45B4A3231272C5EF29F3712D
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to investigate the correlation between the expression of C-reactive protein (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.