Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28923682›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2017

Co-coating of receptor-targeted drug nanocarriers with anti-phagocytic moieties enhances specific tissue uptake versus non-specific phagocytic clearance.

Joshua Kim, Sauradeep Sinha, Melani Solomon, Edgar Perez-Herrero, Janet Hsu, Zois Tsinas, Silvia Muro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Altered blood-brain barrier transport of nanotherapeutics in lysosomal storage diseases.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Unprecedently high targeting specificity toward lung ICAM-1 using 3DNA nanocarriers.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua KimFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Sauradeep SinhaFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Melani SolomonInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Edgar Perez-HerreroInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Janet HsuFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Zois TsinasFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Silvia MuroFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States; Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States. Electronic address: muro@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Training & EducationU54NS065768 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WHITLEY, CHESTER B. · 2009 to 2024
$17.7M
Targeted replacement of defective lysosomal enzymes in the lung and brainR01HL098416 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MURO, SILVIA · 2010 to 2020
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098416NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanocarriers (NCs) help improve the performance of therapeutics, but their removal by phagocytes in the liver, spleen, tissues, etc. diminishes this potential. Although NC functionalization with polyethylene glycol (PEG) lowers interaction with phagocytes, it also reduces interactions with tissue cells. Coating NCs with CD47, a protein expressed by body cells to avoid phagocytic removal, offers an alternative. Previous studies showed that coating CD47 on non-targeted NCs reduces phagocytosis, but whether this alters binding and endocytosis of actively-targeted NCs remains unknown. To evaluate this, we used polymer NCs targeted to ICAM-1, a receptor overexpressed in many diseases. Co-coating of CD47 on anti-ICAM NCs reduced macrophage phagocytosis by ∼50% for up to 24 h, while increasing endothelial-cell targeting by ∼87% over control anti-ICAM/IgG NCs. Anti-ICAM/CD47 NCs were endocytosed via the CAM-mediated pathway with efficiency similar (0.99-fold) to anti-ICAM/IgG NCs. Comparable outcomes were observed for NCs targeted to PECAM-1 or transferrin receptor, suggesting broad applicability. When injected in mice, anti-ICAM/CD47 NCs reduced liver and spleen uptake by ∼30-50% and increased lung targeting by ∼2-fold (∼10-fold over IgG NCs). Therefore, co-coating NCs with CD47 and targeting moieties reduces macrophage phagocytosis and improves targeted uptake. This strategy may significantly improve the efficacy of targeted drug NCs.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD47 AntigenDrug CarriersEndocytosisEndothelial CellsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1LiverMice, Inbred C57BLNanostructuresParticle SizePhagocytosisPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Polyethylene GlycolsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerCD47 AntigenDrug CarriersIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Polyethylene GlycolsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerReceptors, TransferrinBiodistributionCD47Phagocytic clearanceReceptor-mediated endocytosisTargeted drug nanocarriers

Identifiers

PMID28923682
PMCPMC5667353
OpenAlexW2750778799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.