Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28923313›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018

Functional brain networks for learning predictive statistics.

Joseph Giorgio, Vasilis M Karlaftis, Rui Wang, Yuan Shen, Peter Tino, Andrew Welchman, Zoe Kourtzi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611788 (Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611788 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled108ConditionsHealthyArmsStructure Learning Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Time-varying functional connectivity as Wishart processes.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Confidence of probabilistic predictions modulates the cortical response to pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph GiorgioDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vasilis M KarlaftisDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rui WangDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuan ShenDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China; School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Peter TinoSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew WelchmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: zk240@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H012508/1Wellcome Trust 095183/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making predictions about future events relies on interpreting streams of information that may initially appear incomprehensible. This skill relies on extracting regular patterns in space and time by mere exposure to the environment (i.e., without explicit feedback). Yet, we know little about the functional brain networks that mediate this type of statistical learning. Here, we test whether changes in the processing and connectivity of functional brain networks due to training relate to our ability to learn temporal regularities. By combining behavioral training and functional brain connectivity analysis, we demonstrate that individuals adapt to the environment's statistics as they change over time from simple repetition to probabilistic combinations. Further, we show that individual learning of temporal structures relates to decision strategy. Our fMRI results demonstrate that learning-dependent changes in fMRI activation within and functional connectivity between brain networks relate to individual variability in strategy. In particular, extracting the exact sequence statistics (i.e., matching) relates to changes in brain networks known to be involved in memory and stimulus-response associations, while selecting the most probable outcomes in a given context (i.e., maximizing) relates to changes in frontal and striatal networks. Thus, our findings provide evidence that dissociable brain networks mediate individual ability in learning behaviorally-relevant statistics.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingDecision MakingHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryNeural PathwaysPattern Recognition, VisualBrain plasticityfMRIFunctional Network ConnectivityIndividual differencesStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID28923313
PMCPMC6181801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.