Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28923275›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

In vivo magnetic resonance images reveal neuroanatomical sex differences through the application of voxel-based morphometry in C57BL/6 mice.

Cassandra E Meyer, Florian Kurth, Stefano Lepore, Josephine L Gao, Hadley Johnsonbaugh, Mandavi R Oberoi, Stephen J Sawiak, Allan MacKenzie-Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deletion of the X-chromosomal geneScience translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The X factor in neurodegeneration.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cassandra E MeyerDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Florian KurthDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stefano LeporeDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Josephine L GaoDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hadley JohnsonbaughDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mandavi R OberoiDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephen J SawiakWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Box 65 Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Allan MacKenzie-GrahamDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: amg@ucla.edu.

Funding

AN INFORMATICS FACILITY FOR NEUROIMAGINGC06RR015431 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2000 to 2000
$2.0M
Bringing CLARITY to EAER01NS086981 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MACKENZIE-GRAHAM, ALLAN JAMES · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
High Capacity Storage System for Computational BiologyS10OD011939 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WOODS, ROGER P · 2012 to 2012
$598k
EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONC06RR012169 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAZZIOTTA, JOHN C · 1996 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012169NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015431NIH HHS S10 OD011939NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaviorally relevant sex differences are often associated with structural differences in the brain and many diseases are sexually dimorphic in prevalence and progression. Characterizing sex differences is imperative to gaining a complete understanding of behavior and disease which will, in turn, allow for a balanced approach to scientific research and the development of therapies. In this study, we generated novel tissue probability maps (TPMs) based on 30 male and 30 female in vivo C57BL/6 mouse brain magnetic resonance images and used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to analyze sex differences. Females displayed larger anterior hippocampus, basolateral amygdala, and lateral cerebellar cortex volumes, while males exhibited larger cerebral cortex, medial amygdala, and medial cerebellar cortex volumes. Atlas-based morphometry (ABM) revealed a statistically significant sex difference in cortical volume and no difference in whole cerebellar volume. This validated our VBM findings that showed a larger cerebral cortex in male mice and a pattern of dimorphism in the cerebellum where the lateral portion was larger in females and the medial portion was larger in males. These results are consonant with previous ex vivo studies examining sex differences, but also suggest further regions of interest.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsBrainFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMice, Inbred C57BLAtlas-based morphometryMagnetic resonance imageSexual dimorphismVoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID28923275
PMCPMC5716897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.