Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28923212›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology2017

A molecular and preclinical comparison of the PD-1-targeted T-cell checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab.

Petros Fessas, Hassal Lee, Shinji Ikemizu, Tobias Janowitz

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petros FessasSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hassal LeeSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Shinji IkemizuDivision of Structural Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tobias JanowitzCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: tj212@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24868Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell checkpoint inhibition has a profound impact on cancer care and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-targeted antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been two of the lead molecules of this therapeutic revolution. Their clinical comparability is a highly relevant topic of discussion, but to a significant degree is a consequence of their molecular properties. Here we provide a molecular, preclinical, and early clinical comparison of the two antibodies, based on the available data and recent literature. We acknowledge the limitations of such comparisons, but suggest that based on the available data, differences in clinical trial outcomes between nivolumab and pembrolizumab are more likely drug-independent than drug-dependent.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsHumansLymphocyte ActivationMolecular StructureNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorT-LymphocytesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsNivolumabpembrolizumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorNivolumabPD-1PembrolizumabT-cell checkpoint

Identifiers

PMID28923212
PMCPMC5612055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.