Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28923122›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Feed in summer, rest in winter: microbial carbon utilization in forest topsoil.

Lucia Žifčáková, Tomáš Větrovský, Vincent Lombard, Bernard Henrissat, Adina Howe, Petr Baldrian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phylogenetic diversity and community structure ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Forest microbiome and global change.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucia ŽifčákováInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Praha 4, Czech Republic. zifcakoval@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-2116
Tomáš VětrovskýInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Praha 4, Czech Republic.
Vincent LombardArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Bernard HenrissatArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Adina HoweIowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Petr BaldrianInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Praha 4, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvergreen coniferous forests contain high stocks of organic matter. Significant carbon transformations occur in litter and soil of these ecosystems, making them important for the global carbon cycle. Due to seasonal allocation of photosynthates to roots, carbon availability changes seasonally in the topsoil. The aim of this paper was to describe the seasonal differences in C source utilization and the involvement of various members of soil microbiome in this process.

resultsHere, we show that microorganisms in topsoil encode a diverse set of carbohydrate-active enzymes, including glycoside hydrolases and auxiliary enzymes. While the transcription of genes encoding enzymes degrading reserve compounds, such as starch or trehalose, was high in soil in winter, summer was characterized by high transcription of ligninolytic and cellulolytic enzymes produced mainly by fungi. Fungi strongly dominated the transcription in litter and an equal contribution of bacteria and fungi was found in soil. The turnover of fungal biomass appeared to be faster in summer than in winter, due to high activity of enzymes targeting its degradation, indicating fast growth in both litter and soil. In each enzyme family, hundreds to thousands of genes were typically transcribed simultaneously.

conclusionsSeasonal differences in the transcription of glycoside hydrolases and auxiliary enzyme genes are more pronounced in soil than in litter. Our results suggest that mainly fungi are involved in decomposition of recalcitrant biopolymers in summer, while bacteria replace them in this role in winter. Transcripts of genes encoding enzymes targeting plant biomass biopolymers, reserve compounds and fungal cell walls were especially abundant in the coniferous forest topsoil.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaCarbon CycleForestsSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaBiomassCarbonFungiMicrobiotaSeasonsTranscriptomeCarbonAuxiliary activity enzymesBacteriaCarbohydrate-active enzymesCarbon cycleConiferous forestsDecompositionFungiGlycoside hydrolasesLignocellulose-degradationSeasonalityTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID28923122
PMCPMC5604414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.