Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28922543›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2018

In vitro and in vivo degradation of microfiber bioresorbable coronary scaffold.

Chi-Hung Huang, Sheng-Yang Lee, Sonida Horng, Louis-Georges Guy, Ting-Bin Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bioresorbable Polymeric Scaffold in Cardiovascular Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In vitro and in vivo degradation of microfiber bioresorbable coronary scaffold.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi-Hung HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Yang LeeSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sonida HorngAccellab Inc., Boisbriand, Quebec, J7H 1N8, Canada.
Louis-Georges GuyAccellab Inc., Boisbriand, Quebec, J7H 1N8, Canada.
Ting-Bin YuDuNing Inc., Tustin, California, 92780.
AccelLab (Canada) · CATaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degradation of Mirage Bioresorbable Microfiber Scaffold was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The degradation in polymer molecular weight (MW), strut morphology, and integrity was accessed using gel permeation chromatography (GPC), X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) evaluation. To simulate the physiological degradation in vitro, scaffolds were deployed in silicone mock vessels connected to a peristaltic pumping system, which pumps 37°C phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) at a constant rate. At various time points (30D, 60D, 90D, 180D, 270D, and 360D), the MW of microfibers decreased to 57.3, 49.8, 36.9, 13.9, 6.4, and 5.1% against the baseline. The in vivo degradation study was performed by implanting scaffolds in internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) of mini-swine. At the scheduled sacrifice time points (30D, 90D, 180D, 270D, 360D, and 540D), the implanted ITAs were excised for GPC analysis; the MW of the implanted scaffolds dropped to 58.5, 34.7, 24.8, 16.1, 12.9, and 7.1, respectively. Mass loss of scaffolds reached 72.4% at 540D of implantation. Two stages of hydrolysis were observed in in vitro and in vivo degradation kinetics, and the statistical analysis suggested a positive correlation between in vivo and in vitro degradation. After 6 months of incubation in animals, significant strut degradation was seen in the micro-CT evaluation in all sections as strut fragments and separations. The micro-CT results further confirmed that every sample at 720D had X-ray transmission similar to surrounding tissue, thereby indicating full degradation within 2 years. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 1842-1850, 2018.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBlood Vessel ProsthesisMaterials TestingThoracic ArteriesX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsMaleSwineSwine, Miniaturebiodegradationbiomaterialsbioresorbable scaffolddrug-eluting implantpolylactide

Identifiers

PMID28922543
PMCPMC6635671
OpenAlexW2756283125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.