Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28922510›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2017

Effects of spatial smoothing on functional brain networks.

Tuomas Alakörkkö, Heini Saarimäki, Enrico Glerean, Jari Saramäki, Onerva Korhonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A whole-brain functional connectivity model of Alzheimer's disease pathology.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tuomas AlakörkköDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, PO Box 15400, FI-00076, Aalto, Espoo, Finland.
Heini SaarimäkiDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Enrico GlereanDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Jari SaramäkiDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, PO Box 15400, FI-00076, Aalto, Espoo, Finland.
Onerva KorhonenDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, PO Box 15400, FI-00076, Aalto, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-4824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph-theoretical methods have rapidly become a standard tool in studies of the structure and function of the human brain. Whereas the structural connectome can be fairly straightforwardly mapped onto a complex network, there are more degrees of freedom in constructing networks that represent functional connections between brain areas. For functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, such networks are typically built by aggregating the blood-oxygen-level dependent signal time series of voxels into larger entities (such as Regions of Interest in some brain atlas) and determining their connection strengths from some measure of time-series correlations. Although it is evident that the outcome must be affected by how the voxel-level time series are treated at the preprocessing stage, there is a lack of systematic studies of the effects of preprocessing on network structure. Here, we focus on the effects of spatial smoothing, a standard preprocessing method for fMRI. We apply various levels of spatial smoothing to resting-state fMRI data and measure the changes induced in functional networks. We show that the level of spatial smoothing clearly affects the degrees and other centrality measures of functional network nodes; these changes are non-uniform, systematic, and depend on the geometry of the brain. The composition of the largest connected network component is also affected in a way that artificially increases the similarity of the networks of different subjects. Our conclusion is that wherever possible, spatial smoothing should be avoided when preprocessing fMRI data for network analysis.

Indexed as

AdultBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysRestcentralityconnectomicsfunctional magnetic resonance imagingnetwork hubspreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID28922510
PMCPMC5698731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.