Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28922416›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Multi-level computational methods for interdisciplinary research in the HathiTrust Digital Library.

Jaimie Murdock, Colin Allen, Katy Börner, Robert Light, Simon McAlister, Andrew Ravenscroft, Robert Rose, Doori Rose, Jun Otsuka, David Bourget and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Jaimie MurdockProgram in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1732-5499
Colin AllenProgram in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Katy BörnerProgram in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Robert LightSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Simon McAlisterInternational Centre for Public Pedagogy (ICPuP), Cass School of Education & Communities, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew RavenscroftInternational Centre for Public Pedagogy (ICPuP), Cass School of Education & Communities, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Robert RoseProgram in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Doori RoseProgram in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Jun OtsukaDepartment of Philosophy, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
David BourgetDepartment of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
John LawrenceCentre for Argument Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Chris ReedCentre for Argument Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of East London · GBKyoto University · JPUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We show how faceted search using a combination of traditional classification systems and mixed-membership topic models can go beyond keyword search to inform resource discovery, hypothesis formulation, and argument extraction for interdisciplinary research. Our test domain is the history and philosophy of scientific work on animal mind and cognition. The methods can be generalized to other research areas and ultimately support a system for semi-automatic identification of argument structures. We provide a case study for the application of the methods to the problem of identifying and extracting arguments about anthropomorphism during a critical period in the development of comparative psychology. We show how a combination of classification systems and mixed-membership models trained over large digital libraries can inform resource discovery in this domain. Through a novel approach of "drill-down" topic modeling-simultaneously reducing both the size of the corpus and the unit of analysis-we are able to reduce a large collection of fulltext volumes to a much smaller set of pages within six focal volumes containing arguments of interest to historians and philosophers of comparative psychology. The volumes identified in this way did not appear among the first ten results of the keyword search in the HathiTrust digital library and the pages bear the kind of "close reading" needed to generate original interpretations that is the heart of scholarly work in the humanities. Zooming back out, we provide a way to place the books onto a map of science originally constructed from very different data and for different purposes. The multilevel approach advances understanding of the intellectual and societal contexts in which writings are interpreted.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary StudiesLibraries, DigitalModels, TheoreticalResearchData MiningHumans

Identifiers

PMID28922416
PMCPMC5602542
OpenAlexW2593550342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.