Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28922071›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

Implementing electronic data capture at a well-established health and demographic surveillance site in rural northern Malawi.

Estelle McLean, Albert Dube, Jacky Saul, Keith Branson, Mabvuto Luhanga, Oddie Mwiba, Fredrick Kalobekamo, Steffen Geis, Amelia C Crampin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Estelle McLeana Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Albert Dubea Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Jacky Saula Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Keith Bransona Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Mabvuto Luhangaa Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Oddie Mwibaa Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Fredrick Kalobekamoa Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Steffen Geisa Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.
Amelia C Crampina Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit , Karonga , Malawi.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098610Wellcome Trust 101594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to assess multiple issues of resources, staffing, local opinion, data quality, cost, and security while transitioning to electronic data collection (EDC) at a long-running community research site in northern Malawi. Levels of missing and error fields, delay from data collection to availability, and average number of interviews per day were compared between EDC and paper in a complex, repeated annual household survey. Three focus groups with field and data staff with experience using both methods, and in-depth interviews with participants were carried out. Cost for each method were estimated and compared. Missing data was more common on paper questionnaires than on EDC, and a similar number were carried out per day. Fieldworkers generally preferred EDC, but data staff feared for their employment. Most respondents had no strong preference for a method. The cost of the paper system was estimated to be higher than using EDC. The existing infrastructure and technical expertise could be adapted to using EDC, but changes have an impact on data processing jobs as fewer, and better qualified staff are required. EDC is cost-effective, and, for a long-running site, may offer further savings, as devices can be used in multiple studies and perform several other functions. EDC is accepted by fieldworkers and respondents, has good levels of quality and timeliness, and security can be maintained. EDC is well-suited for use in a well-established research site using and developing existing infrastructure and expertise.

Indexed as

Research DesignComputersCost-Benefit AnalysisData CollectionDemographyHumansInterviews as TopicMalawiPublic Health Surveillancedata qualityElectronic data captureHealth and Demographic Surveillance SiteMalawi

Identifiers

PMID28922071
PMCPMC5645702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.