Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28921474›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2018

Origins of Phantom Limb Pain.

Damien P Kuffler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain treatment.Surgical neurology international · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pain and Reorganization after Amputation: Is Interoceptive Prediction a Key?The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanisms for Reducing Neuropathic Pain.Molecular neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damien P KufflerInstitute of Neurobiology, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, 201 Blvd. del Valle, San Juan, PR, 00901, USA. dkuffler@hotmail.com.
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a chronic neuropathic pain occurring in 45-85% of patients who undergo major amputations of the upper and lower extremities. Chronic pain is physically and mentally debilitating, affecting an individual's potential for self-care and the performance of daily living activities essential for personal and economic independence. In addition, chronic pain may lead to depression and feelings of hopelessness. A National Center for Biotechnology Information study found that in the USA alone, the annual cost of dealing with neuropathic pain is more than $600 billion, with an estimated 20 million people in the USA suffering this condition. PLP manifest predominantly during two time frames post-amputation: during days to a month and again at around 1 year. In most patients, the frequency and intensity of the chronic neuropathic pain diminish over time, but severe pain persists in about 5-10% of patients. The development and maintenance of neuropathic pain is attributed to extremity amputations causing changes in peripheral axon properties and neuronal circuitry in both the peripheral and central nervous systems: peripheral axons, dorsal root ganglia, the spinal cord, and the cortex. However, it is not clear how the changes in neuronal properties in these different locations affect neuropathic pain. Is pain initiated by one set of post-amputation changes while the pain is maintained by another set of changes? If one set of amputation-induced changes, such as those of peripheral axons, are reverted to normal, is the chronic pain reduced or eliminated, while reversing another set of neuronal changes and neuronal circuits to normal do not reduce or eliminate the pain? Or, must all the amputation-induced changes be reverted to normal for pain to be eliminated? While this review examines the mechanisms underlying the induction or maintenance of PLP, it is beyond its scope to examine the mechanisms that may permanently reduce or eliminate neuropathic pain. This paper is the first of two reviews in this journal and deals with the causes of chronic PLP development and maintenance, while the second review examines potential mechanisms that may be responsible for promoting the capacity to coping with PLP by reducing or eliminating it.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAnimalsGanglia, SpinalHumansNerve NetNeuralgiaPhantom LimbSpinal CordBrain stimulationCranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES)Deep brain stimulation (DBS)Motor cortex stimulation (MCS)Neuropathic painSpinal cord injuryTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID28921474
OpenAlexW2754288497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.